Skip to header Skip to main content Skip to footer
Helpful Village logo
Add me to your mailing list
Youtube channel Facebook page
Header image for Pasadena Village showing nearby mountains and the logo of the Pasadena Village

Blog archive

July 2024

June 2024

May 2024

Emergency Preparedness: Are You Ready?
05/28/2024

Farewell from the 2023/24 Social Work Interns
05/28/2024

Gina on the Horizon
05/28/2024

Mark Your Calendars for the Healthy Aging Research California Virtual Summit
05/28/2024

Meet Our New Development Associate
05/28/2024

Putting the Strategic Plan into Practice
05/28/2024

Washington Park: Pasadena’s Rediscovered Gem
05/28/2024

Introducing Civil Rights Discussions
05/22/2024

Rumor of Humor #2416
05/14/2024

Rumor of Humor #2417
05/14/2024

Rumor of Humor #2417
05/14/2024

Rumor of Humor #2418
05/14/2024

Springtime Visitors
05/07/2024

Freezing for a Good Cause – Credit, That Is
05/02/2024

No Discussion Meeting on May 3rd
05/02/2024

An Apparently Normal Person Author Presentation and Book-signing
05/01/2024

Flintridge Center: Pasadena Village’s Neighbor That Changes Lives
05/01/2024

Pasadena Celebrates Older Americans Month 2024
05/01/2024

The 2024 Pasadena Village Volunteer Appreciation Lunch
05/01/2024

Woman of the Year: Katy Townsend
05/01/2024

April 2024

March 2024

February 2024

January 2024

1619 VS 1776, History and Focus

By Richard Myers
Posted: 10/26/2020
Tags:

The discussion began with a continuation on the 1619/1776 discussion from the last meeting. New points included:

 

1.   The community broadly involved in the discussion are not engaging in robust detail checking.  The feeling was this fed the negative views of those who are uncomfortable with the 1619 Project and it's challenging of historical narratives.

 

2.   There were concerns about school discussions involving the 1619 material.  There was a sense of the edited history on the United States being taught versus more recent knowledge about historical facts being incorporated allowing a broader understanding of history from multiple views.

 

3.   A comment was made that knowledge evolves over time and facts are uncovered which increase knowledge framed in past and current context.

 

4.   Several members indicated they viewed the Project as a starting point to ensure the history of the United States was viewed through the lens of slavery thereby enriching the understanding of our history.

 

5.   It was acknowledged that some national associations, foundations, think tanks do not like "settled history" being questioned.  It was noted that these views need to be considered and acknowledged.

 

6.   The current questioning of facts and the lack of data being confirmed was mentioned as part of this process. As was the influence of conservative religious groups.

 

7.     It was noted that students were not being taught the skills to determine what was a fact and how to mitigate the effects of social media.

 

8.   Bret Stephens' Op Ed  in the New York Times regarding 1619 was discussed.

 

9.  The discussion broadened to focus on various aspects of European mistreatment of native peoples noting similarities and differences.

 

Finally, the group discussed the recent decision by the Glendale City Council to apologize for sunset laws and other practices which limited access for peoples of color.

Thanks to  Sharon Jarrett for this summary,

 

 

             

Tagged as 1619
Blogs Topics Posts about this Topic